Using Structure,Outcome, and Process in Evaluating Quality Medical Care Essay Example for Free

Using Structure,Outcome, and Process in Evaluating Quality health check C atomic number 18 EssayAbstract Structure, process, and outcome are the common indicators utilized in evaluating the attribute of aesculapian checkup complaint. This paper will delve on the meaning of structure, process, and outcome indicators as they tinge to the assessment of quality checkup safekeeping.Using Structure,Outcome, and Process in Evaluating Quality health check Care wellness care personnel and medical facilities are constantly demanded to provide a report about the outcome of their entrance of treatment. Governments get in touch with hospitals to provide an accounting of their terminuss so that they could come up with new health care structure, as well as to serve as a back-up for the establishment of new regulations in medical systems. Insurance companies show greater interest in the outcome of medical treatments in stage that they can deliver cost-effective care and benchmarkin g (Van der Ent, 6-7).Providing quality assessment of medical care is important because fiscal departments of health care providers usually it helps them come up with an affordable price in terms of medical care. Newspapers and magazines usually compare the performance of hospitals as far as the safety and satisfaction of their patients are concerned. For patients, they engage the right to be informed about which facility or doctor provides quality medical care (Van der Ent, 6-7).At present, there are various systems in place used in assessing the quality of medical care. In the United Kingdom, for example, the salary of general practitioners are based on how they performed in the Quality and Outcomes model 1. In order to be successful, the hospital or medical facility should establish a stack of indicators (Van der Ent, 6-7).Structure, Process, and Outcome As Indicators Of Quality Medical Care The structure of the medical care serves as the minimize in the delivery of medical ca re to the patient. In administering cystic fibrosis, does the delivery of quality medical care involve otherwise practitioners such as a pulmonist, physiotherapist, dietician, and social worker? (Van der Ent, 6-7) Process indicators, on the other hand, has something to do with how medical care is organized. This means that every procedure requires protocols and guidelines. For example, what is the usual protocol in quantity lung function? How are patients infected by staphylococcus aureus segregated from other patients? (Van der Ent, 6-7) Outcome indicators, meanwhile, is concerned with the result of medical care. It has something to do with statistics such as mortality rate, percentage of complications, number of patients who recover, and so on. The outcome of medical care usually helps in the determining whether care is insufficient as well as in pointing out the reason for the failure of medical care. In most healthcare systems, the basic requirement are the structure and proce ss indicator instead of the outcome(Van der Ent, 6-7).The Advantage of Using Outcome In Assessing Quality Medical Care The outcome of medical care is most often used as the indicator of quality health care. Its reliability as a determinant of quality care cannot be doubted. Aside from that, it much or less provides an accurate assessment of medical care (Donabien, 691-729). However, there are some factors that limits the use of outcomes as an indicator of quality medical care. One of these factors is whether or not the outcome is indeed the relevant indicator. There are instances when outcomes becomes irrelevant especially in cases when the survival of the patient will not be critical but will cause them to be paralyzed or bring about honest complications (Donabien, 691-729).ReferencesC.K. van der Ent(2008). Quality Assessment Is The Truth in the Outcome? European Respiratory Journal, 31, 6-7Donabien, A(2005). Evaluating The Quality of Medical Care. The Milbank Quarterly, 83, 691 729