Positive Effects Can Come From a Lower Birth Rate Essay

In the non-so-distant past, on that point was a military man wide effort to create postal code state growth. The environmental uproar in the 1970s had scientists convinced that with 4 billion or so passel on that designinget, Earth had reached her carrying capacitance. The basic premises was that there wasnt enough room for entirely the masses being born(p) and that there definitely would non be enough room when we reached 2050 and a project nation of 11 billion (Cohen, 1). Though the spheric warming predicts had not begun yet, there were commodious concerns that the planet could not produce enough food for 11 billion people and that we would be overpowering resources at such an alarming pace that being would die from as well umpteen people.Flash advancing thirty years and now, industrialized countries across the world ar expressing concern that they may guide been too hasty in their condemnation of existence growth. In fact, many argon stamp outright worried round their population declines or very slow population growth. They express concern that the scrimping gallop whirl as the burden of the elderly is too great for the younger multiplication to support and care for. wear upon leaders engage there lead not be enough people to do the range that impoverishments done and opposites decry the trend as the true end of the British Empire and the office of Western Civilization as those are the countries with declining stimulate rates. The simplex fair play is that a low birth rate merchantman be a positive choice for the industrialized world, if considered in the right light. This musical theme allow for look at many of the factors contri onlying to the declining population and the effectuates that are likely because of a population decline.To understand how this situation developed, it is interesting to review the last 900 years of human sexuality. In his turn up Two Successive Motivations for the Declining Birth arr ay in the West, Phillippe Aries argues that since the Middle Ages, the shift in societal norms had lead to the declining birth rate. The Church enticed people to a moral stance against pre-marital sex and as the economy evolved from largely agrarian to industrial and even retail based, the large family was no thirster an frugal necessity (646).In an agrarian society, children were a source of cheap labor and a financial gratuity to their parents. The cost of feeding and clothing them was much than made up for by their assistance in earning the family sustenance. scarcely as societies moved away from the furtherm, children became an expense. Indeed, Aries writes, the trend to significantly littler families began in the Middle Ages and proceed unabated until the fluff Boom after the end of World War II (647).The trend toward smaller families was also a sign of planning and forethought. It was assumed that a smaller family could even be considered a measure of self-control and The less the children, the more care and attention that could be devoted to each (Aries, 647) As society became more mobile and people were no longer trapper in the social class that they were born in, people chose smaller families with the idea that they could provide more opportunities for that smaller family and their children would pay back greater economic probability that they did (648). In addition, in the mid-1970s concerns about overpopulation ran rampant.By the mid 1990s, they were in crisis mode. In Science magazine in 1995, JE Cohen wrote, Earths cognitive content to support people is determined both by natural const fallts and by human choices concerning economics, environment, culture (including values and politics), and demography. Human carrying capacity is accordingly dynamic and uncertain. (341). Though scientists argued about what that carrying capacity might be, they warned rabidly that if the exponential population growth were not stopped the capacity wou ld be reached in our childrens lifetime if not our own.Further complicating things was an environmental movement that claimed deforestation to turn the land into agricultural output signal as causing soil erosion and pollution accelerated than we could imagine. If the world growth continued unabated, the population would reach that carrying capacity much sooner because the Earth would be too polluted to sustain life. stock-still now, in An Inconvenient Truth Nobel Prize winner Al Gore points out that trees cut down to provide grazing land for cattle are contributing to global warming because the living trees would pick out cut carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. Though Gore does not make the leap, it is there to behold. Too many people mover more land devoted to food production which means fewer trees and faster global warming.With all that in trust, it is no wonder then that people chose to have smaller families or no families at all. And that is where the new scientific debate and political nightmare began. The United Nations reports that 75 portion of the industrialized nations of the world have reached zero population growth including the United States and most of Western atomic number 63. The population of Britain is still growing at a very slow rate, largely due to immigration, but in Germany and Japan the total population has begun to decline.This has thrown social scientists into a tizzy. They complain that there exit not be enough doers to take all the business lines that are needed they claim the workers testament no longer be fitted to meet the tax demands of their nations and they claim that a declining number of young people willing mean that there is no one around to care for the Baby Boomers as they get older. not surprisingly, many of these doom and gloom predictions are written by Baby Boomers.Instead, it might be benignant to focus on the positive benefits of population control. A smaller population will mean simple things, like less congestion on the highways and fewer people in the one open stop line at the grocery store. But those are the incidental effects of a lower population growth. The key benefits of a smaller population are better access to education, less pollution and therefore less global warming, and more job opportunities.For a decade or so, Americans have been decrying overcrowding in the groom systems as a factor in school performance. In 2003, CNN reported that overcrowding was causing a shell in the temporary classroom business and states across the nation were taking steps to reduce overcrowding (CNN, 1). With a declining birth rate in the industrialized nations, fewer children will need to be educated and the pupil to teacher ratio will decrease. That will lead to more individualized attention for each disciple and better learning opportunities. In addition, as those children get older, instead of being able to raise prices and financial backing students from going to colleg e, colleges and universities will be forced to compete for students.The reality is that smaller class size throughout the educational process will mean that all students are getting a better education, not just the ones who can afford mysterious school or the ones lucky enough to be adroit an attract a teachers interest. Furthermore, as the population seeking a college degree decreases second class universities with questionable accreditation will be driven out of business and the top academic talent will plenteousness in good schools providing good educations.As simple as it sounds, another advantage of a smaller population will be less pollution. Gores movie and other studies of global warming indicate that one of the significant contributors to greenhouse gases are personal vehicles. If there are fewer people, there will by simple logic be fewer cars and fewer cars mean that fewer greenhouse gases are emitted.And, fewer people means less need for food, so some farmland could be returned to forest or converted from vast corporate farms to sustainable small farms which produce healthier food and fewer pollutants. The rain forest of the Amazon River Basin could be left as rain forest with no need for more cattle to feed the worlds confide for bitch consumption and the demand for electricity would fall as there were fewer people using it. As the demand for electricity falls, older, fossil fuel burning electric plants could be shut down or replaced with newer, cleaner burning generation facilities.The ultimate proof of the effect that the population has on the environment can be observed today in India. Environmental pollution is one of the serious problems faced by the people in the country. Rapid population growth, industrialization and urbanization in country are adversely affecting the environment. (Nagdeve, 2). India has polluted its sacred rivers and begun poisoning itself, creating a severe escape of potable water because of its overpopulation. legion(predicate) of the pollution problems come quite simply from human excrement. There are insufficient cloaca facilities and the sewage contaminants the ground water, leading to environmental collapse. With 1.1 billion people, India is the second most populous nation in the world and is being destroyed by its high birth rate (Nagdeve, 33).In China, the worlds largest population has become the primary source of greenhouse gases and is polluting the world at an alarming rate. Though they have instituted some population control measures, the population is so large now that until some of it dies off or moves to other areas, overcrowding and pollution, as well as poor access to resources will continue to be their plight.By far the most concerning aspect of the low-birth rate to most the industrialization nations is the impact it is likely to have on the economy. Naysayers claim the smaller populace will be unable to meet the needs of the elderly population, will be unable to meet th e tax burden placed on them by their parents and grandparents and will not be able to meet the employment needs of the country. The arguments are complicated and may have a food grain of truth in them, but are not the forgone conclusion that they are assumed to be.First, there is the retail store of meeting the needs of the elderly populace. This is in many ways a self-serving argument of the Baby Boom generation the reality is that in the United States, a third of the workforce is now over the age of 55. Because of an aging population and declining growth of the labor force, human resource policies are changing. Companies are pass incentives to keep older workers working past retirement age. Older workers can sometimes replace the lack of younger employees. Opportunities like flextime, part-time, temp work, job sharing, and extended vacations are becoming more common for employees of all ages. Businesses are learning that people of all shapes, sizes, ages, colors, and background s can be good workers (Johnson, 1)Many of the Baby Boomers are living to ripe old ages and will need long term care, but it also means they are staying in the workforce longer. And, they are better able to care for themselves than any previous generation of retirees. In addition, society has seen this short-term boom in the elderly population coming and ahs planned for it. hideaway communities and apartment complexes make care for the elderly much easier than in previous generations. Since they are all rigid in one area instead of being spread out in various private homes, the number of people needed to care for the elderly is greatly reduced.Second, there is the question of the tax burden, again a selfish notion of the elderly that the younger generation should have to support their Social guarantor needs even though it is an unrealistic expectation. Unfortunately, instead of working as Franklin Roosevelt had planned and being a supplement to a personal retirement plan, Social S ecurity has become the only retirement plan for many Americans and the government has continued to bail out failed retirement plan after failed retirement plan, usually due to poor fiscal planning or malfeasance on the part of those overseeing the plan.The simple reality is that the elderly cannot continue to rely on the government to meet all their needs and it is likely that in choosing to have fewer children they chose not to have the financial support of a younger generation. Aries argued that they shouldnt need the financial support family or the government because of their decision not to have a large family. He argued that with the money people saved by not having a family, they should be able to pay for assistant when they reach retirement age (Aries, 629).While this inability to deal with the tax burden is a binding concern, it can also be viewed as a great chance. Many people complain that the authoritative government system is messed up and the tax plan unfair, but n o one seems to be able to do anything about it. Though a collapse of the economic structure is an extreme way to encounter about change, it is a valid way and one that may have to be considered in the close to future.Finally, the argument against low-birth rates is that the there will be insufficient people to work the jobs that need doing. This is perchance the weakest argument of all. Do we really need a Starbucks on every corner and a McDonalds two doors down? The reality is that the economic market will correct itself. Fewer people forthcoming to do the jobs will mean that high school and college students are able to drive part-time work again and it will mean that the unemployment rate will drop. Regardless of the opportunity, there will always be some degree of unemployment either voluntary or temporary, but with greater opportunities available, more people will have better economic opportunities. Yes, some low-paying jobs may go unfilled.If that happens, the need will eq uate to the job growth. Like the tax issue, it will probably mean a restructuring of societal values. If more people are need in the medical field to care for the elderly and society places a higher value on that then serving coffee or flipping burgers, society will adjust to the loss of mass market coffee and fast food. After all, less than fifty years ago, fast food was save thought of. Fast food and poor paying retail jobs were not always a critical part of the American economy and if there is a labor shortage, they might be gone again. If there is a shortage of labor, society will adjust and fill the positions that it most needs.Some economists have argued that with a smaller labor force, economies could collapse as the total productivity level of a nation is decreased, but historical analysis shows us that this too may be a made up forethought and an irrational prediction. In an essay regarding the impact low birth rates will have on the economy, William H. Reid, writing for the Journal on Extension said that history shows that our most productive times in history were when the population was smaller.For example, he said, right after the Black Plague productivity in Europe skyrocketed (Reid, 1). The idea behind the increase was that people had something to work for and out of necessity worked hard to get it. He further argued that while overall productivity might be down, wages will be up as employers compete for qualified staff. That will mean that the economy will be booming.The simple truth is that zero population growth was a good idea twenty years ago and that has not changed. The great majority of opposition to it in Europe and North America is in fact a form of xenophobia, a fear that if other parts of the world outbreed the locals, the local way of life will be destroyed. If analysts were honest and admitted to this fear, there might be more action taken on it. By hiding their fears in other concerns, they miss a chance for honest discourse on the effect that a huge Indian and Chinese population will have on the world.They miss the opportunity to take real action to address the overpopulation concerns of India. Allowing more people to emigrate from overcrowded areas to less crowded areas will cut down on the demands on the resources of individual nations and improve the quality of life around the globe. However, so many areas are insular and afraid to share their land or way of life with anyone of a different culture. If the industrialized countries were at least willing to admit that, there arguments might have more standing in the worlds eyes.The reasons why the birth rate in the industrialized world is dropping are numerous and debatable. Aries suggested that another reason why the birth rate is declining is that people no longer see a way to make the world a better place for their descendants.Whether it is a fear of nuclear annihilation or global warming, many people are touch on that the world will not be a great p lace for the next generation and have specifyd against having children (469). Others have decided to keep the money for their own happiness instead of spending it on a child and some simply wait longer than they meant to and find they unable to have children. any(prenominal) the reasons for the declining birth rate, it is a fact of life in Europe and North America. Those nations can simply decide how to live with the consequences or, as they have in parts of Europe, take extreme action to reverse the course.In Japan and Germany where the population is already beginning to decline, the smaller population had coincided with an economic growth period. Whether this is simply coincidental is hard to tell at this point, but history seems to tell us that the chances are good that a deckling birth rate does not spell doom and gloom and the end of the world. Instead, it will like lead to a period of greater education for the average person, a cleaner environment and a booming economy.It ma y also lead to revolutionary thinking as the countries that have always had plenty of people to do their menial tasks have to consider other alternatives, such as an open border with Mexico so that there are more workers, or allowing a mass immigration from India, to relieve overcrowding there. Whatever the solution, it will require scientific and political minds meeting together and honestly discussing the wants and fears of Europe and North America and their desire to change them.In the end, the best consequence of a declining birth rate might be a further globalization of the world. Areas in the Far East and the Indian subcontinent with population problems will need to find more space and Europe and North America will have to find more workers. If the shinny be worked through and the prejudices and fears overcome, then the best thing that could come from a lower birth rate would be an international melting pot with everyone working together for a better planet, better economy an d a better life.WORKS CITEDAries, Phillippe.Two Successive Motivations for the Declining Birth Rate in the West state and Development Review Vol. 6, No. 4 (Dec., 1980), pp. 645-650 November 20, 2007.Cohen, JE Population growth and earths human carrying capacity Science Vol.269, Issue 5222, Summer, 1995, p. 341-46.Ending overcrowding in California Schools Policylink http//www.policylink.org/Research/SchoolOvercrowding/ November 20, 2007.Johnson, Kelly. The Effects of a Declining Birth Rate on the Labor Force http//cber.cba.ua.edu/rbriefs/ab_jan98.html November 20, 2007.Martin, Steve P. Diverging Fertility among U.S. Women Who Delay Childbearing Past Age 30 Demography , Vol. 37, No. 4 (Nov., 2000), pp. 523-533 November 20,2007.Nagdeve, Dewaram. Environment and Health in India presented to Asian Context at Bangkok, Thailand, June 10, 2002. http//www.iussp.org/Bangkok2002/S09Nagdeve.pdf November 20, 2007.Overcrowding furnish Boom CNN.com http//www.cnn.com/2003/EDUCATION/06/02/cl asssize.portables.ap/index.html November 20, 2007.Reid, Walter H. Will Declining Birt Rates creates a Crisis? Journal of Extension (Summer 1988), Vol. 26, No. 2 , November 20, 2007.